596 research outputs found

    Network Sparsification for Steiner Problems on Planar and Bounded-Genus Graphs

    Full text link
    We propose polynomial-time algorithms that sparsify planar and bounded-genus graphs while preserving optimal or near-optimal solutions to Steiner problems. Our main contribution is a polynomial-time algorithm that, given an unweighted graph GG embedded on a surface of genus gg and a designated face ff bounded by a simple cycle of length kk, uncovers a set F⊆E(G)F \subseteq E(G) of size polynomial in gg and kk that contains an optimal Steiner tree for any set of terminals that is a subset of the vertices of ff. We apply this general theorem to prove that: * given an unweighted graph GG embedded on a surface of genus gg and a terminal set S⊆V(G)S \subseteq V(G), one can in polynomial time find a set F⊆E(G)F \subseteq E(G) that contains an optimal Steiner tree TT for SS and that has size polynomial in gg and ∣E(T)∣|E(T)|; * an analogous result holds for an optimal Steiner forest for a set SS of terminal pairs; * given an unweighted planar graph GG and a terminal set S⊆V(G)S \subseteq V(G), one can in polynomial time find a set F⊆E(G)F \subseteq E(G) that contains an optimal (edge) multiway cut CC separating SS and that has size polynomial in ∣C∣|C|. In the language of parameterized complexity, these results imply the first polynomial kernels for Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest on planar and bounded-genus graphs (parameterized by the size of the tree and forest, respectively) and for (Edge) Multiway Cut on planar graphs (parameterized by the size of the cutset). Additionally, we obtain a weighted variant of our main contribution

    Parameterized Complexity Dichotomy for Steiner Multicut

    Get PDF
    The Steiner Multicut problem asks, given an undirected graph G, terminals sets T1,...,Tt ⊆\subseteq V(G) of size at most p, and an integer k, whether there is a set S of at most k edges or nodes s.t. of each set Ti at least one pair of terminals is in different connected components of G \ S. This problem generalizes several graph cut problems, in particular the Multicut problem (the case p = 2), which is fixed-parameter tractable for the parameter k [Marx and Razgon, Bousquet et al., STOC 2011]. We provide a dichotomy of the parameterized complexity of Steiner Multicut. That is, for any combination of k, t, p, and the treewidth tw(G) as constant, parameter, or unbounded, and for all versions of the problem (edge deletion and node deletion with and without deletable terminals), we prove either that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable or that the problem is hard (W[1]-hard or even (para-)NP-complete). We highlight that: - The edge deletion version of Steiner Multicut is fixed-parameter tractable for the parameter k+t on general graphs (but has no polynomial kernel, even on trees). We present two proofs: one using the randomized contractions technique of Chitnis et al, and one relying on new structural lemmas that decompose the Steiner cut into important separators and minimal s-t cuts. - In contrast, both node deletion versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard for the parameter k+t on general graphs. - All versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard for the parameter k, even when p=3 and the graph is a tree plus one node. Hence, the results of Marx and Razgon, and Bousquet et al. do not generalize to Steiner Multicut. Since we allow k, t, p, and tw(G) to be any constants, our characterization includes a dichotomy for Steiner Multicut on trees (for tw(G) = 1), and a polynomial time versus NP-hardness dichotomy (by restricting k,t,p,tw(G) to constant or unbounded).Comment: As submitted to journal. This version also adds a proof of fixed-parameter tractability for parameter k+t using the technique of randomized contraction

    Polynomial Kernels for Deletion to Classes of Acyclic Digraphs

    Get PDF
    We consider the problem to find a set X of vertices (or arcs) with |X| <= k in a given digraph G such that D = G-X is an acyclic digraph. In its generality, this is DIRECTED FEEDBACK VERTEX SET or DIRECTED FEEDBACK ARC SET respectively. The existence of a polynomial kernel for these problems is a notorious open problem in the field of kernelization, and little progress has been made. In this paper, we consider both deletion problems with an additional restriction on D, namely that D must be an out-forest, an out-tree, or a (directed) pumpkin. Our main results show that for each of these three restrictions the vertex deletion problem remains NP-hard, but we can obtain a kernel with k^{O(1)} vertices on general digraphs G. We also show that, in contrast to the vertex deletion problem, the arc deletion problem with each of the above restrictions can be solved in polynomial time

    Parameterized Complexity of Streaming Diameter and Connectivity Problems

    Get PDF
    We initiate the investigation of the parameterized complexity of Diameter and Connectivity in the streaming paradigm. On the positive end, we show that knowing a vertex cover of size k allows for algorithms in the Adjacency List (AL) streaming model whose number of passes is constant and memory is O(logn) for any fixed k. Underlying these algorithms is a method to execute a breadth-first search in O(k) passes and O(klogn) bits of memory. On the negative end, we show that many other parameters lead to lower bounds in the AL model, where Ω(n/p) bits of memory is needed for any p-pass algorithm even for constant parameter values. In particular, this holds for graphs with a known modulator (deletion set) of constant size to a graph that has no induced subgraph isomorphic to a fixed graph H, for most H. For some cases, we can also show one-pass, Ω(nlogn) bits of memory lower bounds. We also prove a much stronger Ω(n2/p) lower bound for Diameter on bipartite graphs. Finally, using the insights we developed into streaming parameterized graph exploration algorithms, we show a new streaming kernelization algorithm for computing a vertex cover of size k. This yields a kernel of 2k vertices (with O(k2) edges) produced as a stream in poly(k) passes and only O(klogn) bits of memory

    Nearly ETH-Tight Algorithms for Planar Steiner Tree with Terminals on Few Faces

    Full text link
    The Planar Steiner Tree problem is one of the most fundamental NP-complete problems as it models many network design problems. Recall that an instance of this problem consists of a graph with edge weights, and a subset of vertices (often called terminals); the goal is to find a subtree of the graph of minimum total weight that connects all terminals. A seminal paper by Erickson et al. [Math. Oper. Res., 1987] considers instances where the underlying graph is planar and all terminals can be covered by the boundary of kk faces. Erickson et al. show that the problem can be solved by an algorithm using nO(k)n^{O(k)} time and nO(k)n^{O(k)} space, where nn denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. In the past 30 years there has been no significant improvement of this algorithm, despite several efforts. In this work, we give an algorithm for Planar Steiner Tree with running time 2O(k)nO(k)2^{O(k)} n^{O(\sqrt{k})} using only polynomial space. Furthermore, we show that the running time of our algorithm is almost tight: we prove that there is no f(k)no(k)f(k)n^{o(\sqrt{k})} algorithm for Planar Steiner Tree for any computable function ff, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.Comment: 32 pages, 8 figures, accepted at SODA 201

    Parameterized Algorithms for Recognizing Monopolar and 2-Subcolorable Graphs

    Get PDF
    We consider the recognition problem for two graph classes that generalize split and unipolar graphs, respectively. First, we consider the recognizability of graphs that admit a monopolar partition: a partition of the vertex set into sets A,B such that G[A] is a disjoint union of cliques and G[B] an independent set. If in such a partition G[A] is a single clique, then G is a split graph. We show that in O(2^k * k^3 * (|V(G)| + |E(G)|)) time we can decide whether G admits a monopolar partition (A,B) where G[A] has at most k cliques. This generalizes the linear-time algorithm for recognizing split graphs corresponding to the case when k=1. Second, we consider the recognizability of graphs that admit a 2-subcoloring: a partition of the vertex set into sets A,B such that each of G[A] and G[B] is a disjoint union of cliques. If in such a partition G[A] is a single clique, then G is a unipolar graph. We show that in O(k^(2k+2) * (|V(G)|^2+|V(G)| * |E(G)|)) time we can decide whether G admits a 2-subcoloring (A,B) where G[A] has at most k cliques. This generalizes the polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing unipolar graphs corresponding to the case when k=1. We also show that in O(4^k) time we can decide whether G admits a 2-subcoloring (A,B) where G[A] and G[B] have at most k cliques in total. To obtain the first two results above, we formalize a technique, which we dub inductive recognition, that can be viewed as an adaptation of iterative compression to recognition problems. We believe that the formalization of this technique will prove useful in general for designing parameterized algorithms for recognition problems. Finally, we show that, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, no subexponential-time algorithms for the above recognition problems exist, and that, unless P=NP, no generic fixed-parameter algorithm exists for the recognizability of graphs whose vertex set can be bipartitioned such that one part is a disjoint union of k cliques

    Streaming deletion problems parameterized by vertex cover

    Get PDF
    Streaming is a model where an input graph is provided one edge at a time, instead of being able to inspect it at will. In this work, we take a parameterized approach by assuming a vertex cover of the graph is given, building on work of Bishnu et al. [COCOON 2020]. We show the further potency of combining this parameter with the Adjacency List streaming model to obtain results for vertex deletion problems. This includes kernels, parameterized algorithms, and lower bounds for the problems of Π-free Deletion, H-free Deletion, and the more specific forms of Cluster Vertex Deletion and Odd Cycle Transversal. We focus on the complexity in terms of the number of passes over the input stream, and the memory used. This leads to a pass/memory trade-off, where a different algorithm might be favourable depending on the context and instance. We also discuss implications for parameterized complexity in the non-streaming setting

    Subexponential-time parameterized algorithm for Steiner tree on planar graphs

    Get PDF
    The well-known bidimensionality theory provides a method for designing fast, subexponential-time parameterized algorithms for a vast number of NP-hard problems on sparse graph classes such as planar graphs, bounded genus graphs, or, more generally, graphs with a fixed excluded minor. However, in order to apply the bidimensionality framework the considered problem needs to fulfill a special density property. Some well-known problems do not have this property, unfortunately, with probably the most prominent and important example being the Steiner Tree problem. Hence the question whether a subexponential-time parameterized algorithm for Steiner Tree on planar graphs exists has remained open. In this paper, we answer this question positively and develop an algorithm running in O(2^{O((k log k)^{2/3})}n) time and polynomial space, where k is the size of the Steiner tree and n is the number of vertices of the graph. Our algorithm does not rely on tools from bidimensionality theory or graph minors theory, apart from Baker's classical approach. Instead, we introduce new tools and concepts to the study of the parameterized complexity of problems on sparse graphs.publishedVersio
    • …
    corecore